top of page

Google Tasks

Google's productivity app

What's it like?

Habit tracker

iOS/Android/Web

Reviewed by:
Richard
Date of review:
13/02/2024

Mentalica therapist's thoughts

Not applicable

Key features (free)

Completely free for all features. Integrated with other Google products, such as your Gmail account or Google Calendar. Create unlimited to-do-lists, tasks, sub-tasks and reminders

Mentalica user experience

Easy-to-use, completely free app for creating to-do lists, great if you have Google Calendar or other Google products. UX and design could be improved and reminders are smarter in other habit tracking apps

Premium features

No premium features

Credibility

Score

Strong

Company behind the solution

Founded in:

Google

1998

Where the solution operates:

global

The team behind the app

Google's own app.

Price (UK)

Free

Safety and Privacy

Score

Weak

What happens if a mental health crisis is reported?

Not applicable

Is the mental health crisis support or referral working?

Not applicable

Are there controversies reported about the solution?

Alongside the data breaches, Google has frequently been accused of violating users' privacy. In April 2020, the company was sued for at least $5 billion for tracking what people view online and where they browse despite using Incognito mode.

Privacy policy's evaluation

Standard Google privacy policy that already applies to you if you use another Google product (which is highly likely).

Language

English, Afrikaans, Arabic, Basque, Bengali, Bulgarian, Catalan, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, Estonian, Filipino, Finnish, French, Galician, German, Greek, Gujarati, Hebrew, Hindi, Hungarian, Icelandic, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Kannada, Korean, Latvian, Lithuanian, Malay, Malayalam, Marathi, Norwegian Bokmål, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Serbian, Simplified Chinese, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish, Swahili, Swedish, Tamil, Telugu, Thai, Traditional Chinese, Turkish, Ukrainian, Urdu, Vietnamese, Zulu

Effectiveness

Quality of evidence

Not applicable

What does the existing evidence indicate?

Not applicable

bottom of page